Sometimes you will need to turn in a short reading response for a reading assignment. The syllabus makes it very clear what you need to do and when. These encourage everyone to stay on schedule and to read carefully enough to absorb the main ideas of the readings. Especially for online courses, it’s far too easy to put off (and ultimately skip) any work that doesn’t have at least a short assignment connected to it.
In general, these are meant to be somewhat creative exercises to get you to compare and contrast different aspects of the reading and to give you a chance to riff on what you thought was most interesting about them (we all find different things interesting!). Sometimes I just ask you to restate a main point or answer a specific question or two.
Whatever the prompt, there are two motivations for these reflections: 1) encourage you to think critically about the readings 2) allow you to show me that you’re keeping up with the readings (and earn points!)
To mix things up a little, we have different kinds of reflections that we use from time to time. The kind of reflection you should post should be clearly indicated on the syllabus, or is obvious by whether there are questions to answer.
These are probably the most common because they are the most straightforward (if a bit dull). If I have posted some questions on the syllabus, you should answer them.
Provide a brief statement of what you found most interesting about the readings. Try to sketch out answers to:
I score reading reflections according to the rubric below, which is also coded into an official rubric used to score reflections.
For exceptional responses, which might be a bit longer and more insightful than a typical post, I give UP TO 1.5 points EXTRA CREDIT. This makes it easy to make up points you may have missed on a reflection that you didn’t have time to do particularly well.
The idea here is that these reflections should in sum account for a significant but not large portion of your final grade without being unduly stressful to complete.
9–10 points: Clearly demonstrates broad familiarity with the reading assignment and provides specific examples. The response is carefully thought out and clearly articulated.
8 points: Shows some familiarity with the assignment and some critical analysis with examples from the readings but doesn’t really respond to the prompt very well.
6–7 points: A decent effort, but doesn’t show much engagement with the reading, doesn’t make an effort to answer the questions, or is difficult to understand.
3–5 points: You posted something, but it looks like you were posting without reading much at all. Often such posts ignorantly contradict the readings or or all opinion without any references to the readings.
0-2 points: Nothing posted, or otherwise so unintelligible that I can’t even guess at what you were trying to do.