The goal of this class is historical awareness and thinking, not knowledge acquisition. Classes are not places where I just repeat the readings. The readings raise questions that don’t have settled answers, and working them out together is most of the point — so showing up and participating is an essential part of the course.
But “participation” makes a lot of people picture the same narrow thing: the student who talks first, talks most, and always seems to have the “right” answer. That is not what I’m after. I want to see you are engaged with the course and our discussions.
All of these count. None is better than the others.
Plenty of people find talking in class genuinely difficult — because of anxiety, because English is a second language, because the room feels like everyone else already knows more, or because you’d rather think a while before committing to an opinion. None of that means you can’t do well here. You don’t need to have the best comment. You need to be in the conversation.
Being physically present itself counts for very little. It’s obvious when a screen is being used for something other than notetaking. Being on your phone is worse than not coming at all.
Missing class occasionally is life and won’t affect your grade. Missing repeatedly will.
There’s no tally of classroom comments or points. At the end of the semester I make a holistic judgment about whether you were genuinely in the course: present, prepared, and contributing in some form.
The opening history-frustration response and the Early Course Reflection also count here — they’re both ways of telling me where you are, which is its own kind of participation.
If you’re wondering how you’re doing, please ask! But you probably already know if you’re showing me that you’re engaged or not.
If any of this feels impossible for reasons you’d rather explain in person, come talk to me. I would much rather adjust than have you quietly write off 15% of your grade.