Making History • HIST 1105 • Week 11.1
Loewen is cited by the page of the revised edition (The New Press, 2019), which the course PDF reproduces. Hayden is cited by the page of the MIT Press edition.
Today in context
Language. Sources read as texts, and histories as made things.
A machine that puts words together the way readers expect. Whether it can write history.
Commemoration and space. What gets put up, by whom, and who a place lets in.
The campus as a landscape with a past, and the archive behind it.
Loewen · “Some Functions of Public History”
People “live by stories.” Those with no heroic story of their own can borrow the nation’s (p. 13).
The upper class commemorates its past to feel good about itself, and to “stay upper” (p. 13).
Sacred sites for what Robert Bellah called America’s “civil religion.” Memorials make the state, mostly, the thing worth dying for (p. 14).
Colonial Williamsburg has become “a powerful moneymaking machine,” and a marker can “put a town on the map” (pp. 13, 16).
Loewen · what monuments do to thinking
Most war memorials turn their conflicts into “noble causes.” Markers rarely criticize the government (p. 14).
A modest plaque “speaks with authority,” as if its message were “incontestable” (p. 14).
One generation’s monuments become “a force imprisoning the minds” of the next. Local ones can “empower people” too (p. 17).
Oñate · what the statue leaves out
Acoma’s men over twenty-five: a foot cut off and twenty years’ servitude. Younger men and women: twenty years (pp. 122–23).
A Spanish captain counted twenty-four maimed (p. 123). Some of Oñate’s defenders now say toes, not feet.
A royal judge found him guilty of crimes including killing innocent and guilty alike at Acoma, and banished him (p. 184).
Before the 400th anniversary, someone cut off its right foot, claiming to act for Acoma. It came down in 2020.
George P. Hammond, Don Juan de Oñate and the Founding of New Mexico (1927).
Loewen · “The Sociology of Historic Sites”
Early one-person offices made errors; review boards from the late 1950s did better. In Georgia, a legislator’s call could still take a marker down (pp. 18–20).
Often a private club raises part of the cost and a city or state pays the rest. No relatively disinterested state body reviews monuments (pp. 20–21).
Indian wars, which many textbooks drop; labor, which has influence and money; and the upper class, “always” (pp. 21–22).
Communities usually mark “only their happy history.” Burlington honors Ethan Allen, whom Abenakis see as “a rapacious Indian-hater” (p. 23).
Hassanamesit · November 1675
“they will either force you all to some Island as the Natick Indians are, where you will be in danger to be starved with cold and hunger, and most probably in the end be all sent out of the country for slaves.”
About two hundred went with the fighters. By December the colony held five hundred other Christian Indians on Deer Island, “bleak and cold” (pp. 476, 485).
Hassanamisco Nipmuc families still hold a small reservation in Grafton.
Loewen · how to read a marker
“Markers and monuments are often written in stone, but they are not written by gods. People put them up.”
Ask, “How might this be wrong?” Distrust “According to tradition . . .” Ask why the sponsors went to the trouble of putting it up (pp. 20–21).
Hayden · The Power of Place, 1995
“This chapter sketches a way to frame the social history of urban space, a scholarly terrain where many fields overlap.” Hayden, The Power of Place, p. 15
Loewen stops at markers and monuments. Hayden, an architect who taught at UCLA and Yale, ran The Power of Place in Los Angeles, marking sites of working people’s lives.
Hayden · Lefebvre, 1974
“Authentic knowledge of space must address the question of its production.” Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space (1974), Hayden’s epigraph, p. 14
Hayden builds the chapter on the French sociologist Henri Lefebvre. Her question is how any place gets made, and for whom.
Hayden · the production of space
“Indigenous residents as well as colonizers, ditchdiggers as well as architects, migrant workers as well as mayors, housewives as well as housing inspectors, are all active shaping the urban landscape.”
The production of space: how places are “planned, designed, built, inhabited, appropriated, celebrated, despoiled, and discarded” (p. 15).
Hayden · “place”
“‘Place’ is one of the trickiest words in the English language, a suitcase so overfilled one can never shut the lid. It carries the resonance of homestead, location, and open space in the city as well as a position in a social hierarchy.”
Place reaches all five senses, which makes it “powerful as a source of memory” (p. 18).
Phrases like “knowing one’s place” are spatial and political at once (p. 16). Cultural geography, she says, kept to rural landscapes, “avoiding issues of political contestation” (p. 17).
Lefebvre, through Hayden · pp. 18–19
Spaces “shaped for mining, manufacturing, commerce, or real estate speculation.”
Biological reproduction, in the space in and around the body.
Reproduction of the labor force, in the space of housing.
Reproduction of social relations, in the public space of the city.
Hayden · three histories to write
Who built and kept up the farms, mines, railroads and streetcars, a history that has “barely been studied” (pp. 20–22).
Ghettos and barrios, reservations and camps; for women, the body, the home and the street: territories with enforced boundaries (pp. 22–29).
The political life of ordinary buildings: who built, owned, regulated and rented them (pp. 30–34).
Hayden · territorial histories
“One of the consistent ways to limit the economic and political rights of groups has been to constrain social reproduction by limiting access to space.”
An African American lawyer who grew up there remembered, “As teen-agers, we knew not to drive into Compton, to Inglewood, not to drive into Glendale” (quoted in Hayden, p. 23).
Hayden · ordinary buildings
“most buildings can be understood in terms of power or authority—as efforts to assume, extend, resist, or accommodate it.”
A New York tenement around 1900 could return its landlord 25 percent a year. “One building tells the story of thousands of developers and millions of tenants” (pp. 33–34).
Hayden · the chapter’s end
“Places make memories cohere in complex ways. People’s experiences of the urban landscape intertwine the sense of place and the politics of space.”
In East Harlem, Puerto Rican organizers built casitas, island houses, among abandoned tenements. They “produced their own public space,” Hayden’s example of Lefebvre’s “counter-space” (pp. 35–36).
Loewen and Hayden
Markers and monuments are documents with sponsors. Ask who got them approved, who paid, and how they might be wrong (pp. 18–21).
Every street and building was produced by someone, for work and for daily life, and its boundaries often keep people out (pp. 19–22, 30).
The lecture · looking back
Flatter, sell and unify more than they teach, and usually mark only the happy history.
A founder without Acoma, a mission village without the war that emptied it.
Work, territory and ordinary buildings, read as the production of space, down to a remodeled Hodgin Hall.
The take home
When it went up, who paid, and what they were proud of. The Grafton marker tells more about 1930 than about 1651.
The rest of the landscape is a source too. Tunnels, movie houses and tenements record who built them and who was kept out (pp. 20–34).
The catch: a corrected marker is still a marker. It speaks with the same authority Loewen distrusts.
Next · Thursday, 11.2
Hodgin Hall stands on the campus you are researching. Its records may show who argued over the 1908 remodel, and why.