Making History • HIST 1105 • Week 14.2
Cronon and Chakrabarty are cited by the journal’s page numbers. Braudel is quoted from On History, trans. Sarah Matthews (1980), as in Week 5.2.
Before 1970 · backdrop
“Long the barely noticed backdrop to human activity, the natural world initially entered history as the vulnerable object of human hubris and greed.” Maza, Thinking About History, p. 109
Nineteenth-century Americans told the settling of the wilderness as a triumph. Rival accounts told it as the destruction of nature (p. 109).
1970s · a field with a cause
“this field has, since taking shape in its modern form starting in the 1970s, been closely connected with a specific political project, that of environmental conservation.” Maza, Thinking About History, p. 109
Its early books mostly showed people damaging nature (p. 111).
1967 · wilderness
“Roderick Nash’s Wilderness and the American Mind has played a significant role in helping frame debates about wilderness protection in the three decades since its publication.” Cronon, “The Uses of Environmental History,” pp. 2–3
Cronon also calls it a “whig history of wilderness consciousness” (p. 22 n. 27).
1979 · decline
“Dust Bowl and Rivers of Empire located the origins of environmental degradation in capitalist world-views and modes of production that are as alive in the present as they have been in the past.” Cronon, “The Uses of Environmental History,” p. 3
Maza calls Donald Worster’s Dust Bowl (1979) a “classic, still popular account” (p. 110 n. 62).
1983 · Changes in the Land
“The pig was not merely a pig … but a creature bound among other things to the fence, the dandelion, and a very special definition of property.” Cronon, Changes in the Land (1983), quoted in Maza, p. 112
Native people moved with the seasons. Colonists fenced, cleared and sold. Cronon avoids “villains and victims” (pp. 111–12).
1986 · Ecological Imperialism
“they came with invisible and ultimately irresistible biological allies: weeds, proliferating livestock such as rabbits and pigs, and above all pathogens.” Maza, Thinking About History, p. 114
Alfred Crosby’s book asks why Europeans settled so successfully in North America, Australia and New Zealand (pp. 113–14).
1997 · Guns, Germs, and Steel
“In short, you don’t need Christianity, capitalism, or the Chinese work ethic, let alone the putative superiority of Caucasian or Asian genes, to account for the Eurasian advantage.”
Many historians dispute Jared Diamond’s “stark environmental determinism” (p. 113).
If geography explains who conquered whom, what is left for people to have decided?
2010 · Mosquito Empires
“Thanks to their insect allies and despite the weakness of their home country, the Spanish held on to their empire.” Maza, Thinking About History, p. 115
J. R. McNeill’s example: the British took Havana in 1762, but yellow fever killed more of their troops there than died in all of North America during the Seven Years’ War (p. 115).
By the 1990s · subjects
Carolyn Merchant, The Death of Nature (1980): “western science has harmed nature and women in parallel ways” (Cronon, p. 3).
Stephen Pyne’s histories of fire, written to show managers “the complexity of their task” (Cronon, p. 3).
Joel Tarr’s studies of “pollution and waste streams,” aimed at policymakers (Cronon, p. 3).
“People mismanage fish” when they misunderstand ecosystems (Cronon, p. 9).
“the socially unequal impact of urban physical environments” (Maza, p. 111).
The “shifting status of animals in human societies” (Maza, p. 115).
A second generation · hybrid
“current scholarship mostly rejects the myth of a pure, unsullied nature in favor of the view that ‘all environments are hybrid.’” Maza, Thinking About History, p. 110, quoting Paul Sutter
Earlier historians described a dam as nature destroyed. Later ones called the dammed river a “second nature” (p. 110).
Is a dammed river still nature?
Cronon · 1993 · the question
“What my students had apparently concluded from their encounter with my subject was that the American environment had gone from good to bad in an unrelentingly depressing story that left little or no hope for the future.”
The essay asks what the field is good for, and for whom (pp. 2–7).
Cronon · 1993 · findings
Buyers and sellers “link together ecosystems and encourage change, rarely understanding the full ecological implications” (p. 8).
People who move “carry with them other organisms—plants, animals, microbes” (p. 8).
Technology’s effects “are powerfully mediated by the cultures in which they are embedded” (p. 8).
“If you want to understand people’s environmental values, watch what they throw away” (p. 9).
Cronon, “The Uses of Environmental History,” pp. 8–9
Cronon · 1993 · thinking like a historian
“All human history has a natural context.” People “are not the only actors who make history” (p. 13).
“Neither nature nor culture is static.” Eras of balance are “almost surely golden-age myths” (p. 13).
“All environmental knowledge is culturally constructed and historically contingent—including our own” (p. 14).
“Historical wisdom usually comes in the form of parables, not policy recommendations or certainties” (p. 16).
Constructivists treated scientific knowledge as made, not found. Cronon agrees, but nature still “exists quite apart from what we believe about it” (p. 15).
Cronon · 1993 · parables
“Rather than make predictions about what will happen, we offer parables about how to interpret what may happen.”
A city council deciding whether to build on a floodplain asks a historian what will happen. What can the historian usefully say?
Chakrabarty · 2009 · climate
“To call human beings geological agents is to scale up our imagination of the human. … we can become geological agents only historically and collectively, that is, when we have reached numbers and invented technologies that are on a scale large enough to have an impact on the planet itself.”
Environmental historians had shown people as biological agents, carrying germs, crops and animals. Changing the climate is a different scale of power, acquired only since the Industrial Revolution (pp. 205–7).
Braudel and Chakrabarty
“a history that is almost changeless, the history of man in relation to his surroundings” (On History, p. 3)
“this slow and apparently timeless backdrop for human actions transforms itself with a speed that can only spell disaster for human beings” (p. 205)
Braudel made the environment active when most historians left it as scenery (p. 205). Even environmental history, Chakrabarty says, was “still a vision of man ‘as a prisoner of climate,’” in Braudel’s phrase, “and not of man as the maker of it” (p. 206).
Chakrabarty · 2009 · freedom
“The mansion of modern freedoms stands on an ever-expanding base of fossil-fuel use. Most of our freedoms so far have been energy-intensive.”
Historians since the Enlightenment have told modern history as a story of growing freedom. Does coal belong in that story?
The take home
“There cannot be people outside of nature; there can only be people thinking they are outside of nature.”
Historians first made nature an actor in human history. Climate change now makes humans an actor in the planet’s history.
Next · 15.1 · food history